On July 30th, the Project for Nuclear Awareness sponsored a packed screening of the provocative film by Lucy Walker and Lawrence Bender, Countdown to Zero. Afterward, there was a discussion at the Ritz Theater, featuring speakers Todd Fine, Countdown to Zero Researcher, Mary Boardman, PNA Assistant Director, and Kim Thao-Nguyen, of Ban All Nukes Generation USA, and producer of Disarm TV.
We’re grateful for all who attended, many of whom said they are moved to act on what they learned. Look for an audio recording of the discussion, and video interviews with audience members responding to the film, coming soon to DisarmTV. Share your thoughts about Countdown to Zero in in a video and send it to Emily at emily.pna@gmail.com, to have it featured on Disarm TV.
During the discussion, we agreed that the new START Treaty is not just needed, but essential. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee may vote on the Treaty as early as this week—so call or write your Senator, which you can do right here- every call and letter counts! PNA fully supports the Treaty, but not the deal to increase spending on the nuclear weapons complex. We believe this is both wasteful and counter-productive, in terms of the credibility that new START is regaining, after years of previous rollback on our solemn international commitments.
Another important conversation was about “nuclear policy champions” in the Senate. PNA has been working with Senator Bob Casey (D-PA), who has already stepped up on START and other key issues. An audience member noted: “We hope that both the Senator and others step up in support of the ultimate disarmament of our nuclear weapons.” In fact, Casey has supported the call by the President for a world free of nuclear weapons. What we’d like is a clearer statement by the Administration of the ways and means we’ll get there. In the end, we believe that people often lead their governments to change, as much as the other way around. This is why your votes, and your calls and letters are so important.
Yet another hot topic discussed on the agenda: We need policy champions on bloated spending, both on nuclear weapons and other weapons systems. We’re happy to see forward motion in the Report, Debt, Deficits, & Defense: A Way Forward, by the Sustainable Defense Task Force, commissioned by Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts.
As reported by CLW blogger Laicie Olson, we can save “nearly $1 trillion over ten years,” in this area alone. This is not just rhetoric, but carefully planned reductions that would not jeopardize security, according to discussions we’ve had with defense experts.
“I do not believe after this proposed plan is circulated that people will be able to dismiss the argument that you can responsibly, and at no cost to America’s genuine security, make reductions of over a trillion dollars for what has been proposed for the military budget,” Frank said at the release on Friday.
Cuts include further reductions to the U.S. nuclear arsenal and limits on the planned modernization of the nuclear weapons complex, which could save approximately $140 billion over 10 years. When missile defense and space spending are also selectively curtailed, that number is increased to $194.5 billion.
So write your Senator and House Member, the first on START and Zero Nukes, and both in support of the Task Force’s conclusions: We can safely cut levels of missile defense, we can cut unneeded systems, and we need to use the savings productively, in at least two ways.
One, we need to fund better verification of our treaties; this will make the ultimate dream of a nuclear-free world come closer to reality, as people gain assurance that all nuclear fuel cycles, all states with nuclear power, and all nuclear weapons remaining in arsenals are closely monitored. Two, we need a Fissile Materials Control Treaty. This is on the Obama administration’s agenda, and we need to push strongly for it to happen and not wither on the vine after the November election. This treaty, like START, will need money for verification—but much less money than we would spend on new weapons complexes, by a factor of ten or more.
The American people have to ask themselves: Do we want business-as-usual from the US Congress? Or do we want superior security and a peaceful foreign policy at a more reasonable price? Let them know what you think. Call, write, or visit Congress. If you are interested in upcoming PNA visits to Congress in early August and mid-September, please call executive assistant Emily Gleason, or Ed Aguilar, executive director, at 215-546-3030, or email emily.pna@gmail.com.